Leveraged Loan Credit Agreement

Posted on

Most U.S. credit contracts allow borrowers to simultaneously use the clear and frank text and the leverage-based incremental basket, not to mention the former as levers for the reporting test. Borrowers have also become more creative with provisions that allow, over the term of the loan, increases in the clear basket, including proportional increases in deductible and net increases for voluntary advances on existing loans and/or a voluntary reduction in current liabilities, and by adding a „Grower“ component to the free and clear basket that increases with the increase in EBITDA (or total assets). In Europe, in recent years, similar cost ceilings have generally increased from 5% to 10% of unadjusted EBITDA in 2015 to 20% in 201919.19 Lenders in the European market are increasingly aware of the by-product pitfalls when incorporating uncapped EBITDA supplements into their credit documents. Indeed, in the first half of 2019, the decline in the number of European agreements with unacculated add-backs continued (from 47% in 2017 and from 33% in 2018 to 25% in the third quarter of 2019).20 However, in most cases, the amount of the other transaction, toll, is likely to be accounted for by one bank by taking part of a credit. This is why issuers are anxious to allocate bonds and other share transfer transactions to banks that are part of their credit consortium. Here`s what a mezzanine note issued to finance a loan-financed buyout might look like: typical prepayment fees are set on a slippery scale. For example: 2% in the first year and 1% in the second year. The levy may apply to all loan repayments, including asset sales and excess cash flows (a „heavy“ levy) or, in particular, discretionary payments from refinancing or cash (a „soft“ tax). Like the LMA in Europe, the LSTA was established in the United States (an organization of banks, funds, law firms and other financial institutions) to develop standard procedures and practices in the corporate credit market. One of the main practical differences between the LSTA and the LMA is that LSTA forms are rarely used as a negotiating project and that documentation of the LSTA form for U.S.

loan contracts is generally used only for certain mechanical and „various“ provisions of contracts. B loans, such as the defaulting lender provisions, the European Union`s „lease-in“ provisions, libor replacement mechanisms, terms of residence in QFC and tax provisions. Historically, the practice of U.S. documentation was based on forms of lead bank or agent (which, in fact, could have contained at least some of the recommended LSTA language), but this is no longer the case, as the parties almost always identify a „documentary pre-investigation case“. In the case of a business borrower, this may be the borrower`s existing credit contract or another similar borrower in the same sector. It is likely that a sub-sponsored borrower will identify existing documents for another of the sponsor`s portfolio companies, which will require federbank to identify provisions that could have a negative effect on syndication.